By Adam Nayman
Dir. John Favreau, U.S., Paramount
The centerpiece scene of Jon Favreauâ€™s Iron Man finds its tin-plated protagonist jetting over to Afghanistan to lay waste to some indigenous bad guys. Form dictates that I tell you that itâ€™s Tony Stark (Robert Downey, Jr.), a wunderkind weapons manufacturer, underneath the armor, though based on the opening weekend grosses, itâ€™s a statistical probability that youâ€™ve already seen the film, perhaps even twice. Earlier in the film, these same rascals had kidnapped our boy Stark from an American military convoy, held him hostage (causing a near fatal injury to his heart), directed him to build them a high-tech missile, and then dropped like Team America marionettes (â€śdurka durka! Aahhh!â€ť) when he revealed the real fruits of his clandestine laborsâ€”a prototype version of the Iron Man suit. (But again, you probably knew that already).
Before Stark lands, we get a fairly standard-issue depiction of warlord malfeasance; shooting off rounds in front of scared villagers, separating children from their parents, slapping people around, scowling. Stark touches down and proceeds to kick ass, implacably absorbing his foesâ€™ gunfire, flooring them with palm mounted force cannons, and, in the coup de grĂ˘ce, scanning a crowd comprised of terrorists and hostages and, having instantly figured out whoâ€™s who, (we go inside the helmet and see a Terminator-style visual readout), dropping the nasties with whisper-quiet precision blasts. Quick, easy, and, above all, neatâ€”and then heâ€™s off.
As far as do-goodery goes, this Middle Eastern excursion beats pulling cats out of trees; the joke is that it seems about as effortless. The scene feels like neo-conservative wish fulfillmentâ€”imagine a piece of military hardware that can enter another country undetected, automatically distinguish between the guilty and the innocent and emerge with its chassis and reputation unscathed. (Not to mention the fact that Starkâ€™s turbo-charged interventionism is tinged by personal vengeance; he didnâ€™t choose that particular corner of Afghanistan by accident). But Favreauâ€™s film is too canny to tow any sort of political line (especially not an unpopular one; there are untold millions of dollars at stake, after all) and so its stance on American military might gets some token complications (though it never denies that the suit looks really cool!). Starkâ€™s business partner and mentor, Obadiah Stane (a creepily avuncular and magnificently bearded Jeff Bridges) is revealed to be in bed with the Afghanisâ€”and, furthermore, determined to sell Starkâ€™s ingenious weaponry to the highest bidder. So we have evil terrorists (fair enough) and a compromised military-industrial complex (of course), leaving Tony Starkâ€”a newly repentant war profiteer surveying the damage caused by his creations and having a subsequent (and literal) change of heart (once more for form: his shrapnel-damaged ticker is being powered by the same small and unaccountably powerful reactor that makes the suit go)â€”as the most sympathetic figure around.
I wonâ€™t spend too much time talking about Downeyâ€™s work here, as everyone else has gotten there first; suffice it to say that such a wide-awake actor in the sort of role that too often countenances somnolence (recall Brandon Routhâ€™s sulky Superman) was a very good idea (just as it was back in 1989 when Michael Keaton stepped into the Batsuit). To a certain extent, Downey is simply relying on shtickâ€”the tongue-in-cheek motormouth act he perfected in (the near-perfect) Kiss Kiss Bang Bangâ€”but itâ€™s good shtick, anyway, and tough to begrudge in this context. When a convalescent Stark calls a press conference to inform the dubious masses of his new peacenik tendencies, he slumps tiredly in front of the podium, cheeseburger in hand, and asks the journalists to sit down, too: the gleam of self-satisfaction when they assent unites the character and the actor in supreme bemusement.
If the performance grows less interesting as the film goes along, itâ€™s because Favreau has front-loaded the good stuff: Iron Man eventually boils down to two guys (one good, one bad) donning robot suits and throwing down in the middle of the street, and issues of whether this stuff is relatively well-done (which it is) are subordinate to frustrations that they (â€śtheyâ€ť being Hollywood screenwriters) still havenâ€™t found a way to escape this kind of structural strait-jacket. The clever touch of having a severely weakened Stark power up for the final battle by re-inserting the first version of his pacemakerâ€”which his long-suffering but lately amorous assistant Pepper Potts (Gwyneth Paltrow, trying surprisingly hard and coming up with a charming little turn) had placed under glass with the legend â€śProof That Tony Stark Has a Heartâ€ťâ€”is merely that: clever. Itâ€™s too spelled-out to be truly affecting (the same goes for the resurrection imagery when Tony emerges from his cave prison).
Still, clever and cogent beats idiotic and incoherent, and Iron Man is spryer than the overwhelming majority of films in its budget range. Favreau showed a talent for framing handmade special effects in the enjoyable Jumanji-in-space romp Zathura, and Iron Manâ€™s best moments are similarly low-fi: a relaxed montage of Stark fine-tuning the suit in his workshop, ostensibly shot by his own surveillance cameras, alternates between oopsy-daisy comic setbacks and miniature eureka moments, all leant extra credibility by the camcorder-ish visual texture. (Thereâ€™s one great, Jackass-style slapstick gag that fairly reeks of Ebaumsworld.com). This section is crowned by a nighttime flight-test that showcases Matthew Libatiqueâ€™s clarion cinematography and Dan Lebetalâ€™s seamless cutting: itâ€™s not an action sequence, exactly, but I canâ€™t recall the last FX set pieceâ€”or, for that matter, the last â€śsummer movieâ€ťâ€”with this kind of stratospheric kick, even if itâ€™s only intermittent.