By Elbert Ventura
Dir. Wes Anderson, U.S., Focus Features
Seven movies into Wes Andersonâ€™s career, the arguments rage on but the opinions have settled: you know by now where you stand on the matter. Love him or hate himâ€”and there seems to be little in betweenâ€”only the churlish would deny him credit for bringing back something of the old cinephilia. Itâ€™s not so much his foregrounded auteurism or movie-mad aesthetic that Iâ€™m talking about, but his status as a flashpoint. In a time when mainstream critics can gaze upon the remarkable last year and a half in movies and offer little more than a shrug, Anderson makes for a welcome antidote to ambivalence. He inspires the kind of partisanship that was more common when Andersonâ€™s New Wave and New Hollywood heroes roamed the earth.
But to say weâ€™ve made up our minds on Wes Anderson is not to say weâ€™re done wrestling with him. Because he has been so influentialâ€”not just on other filmmakers but also on the wider culture, he is a uniquely difficult artist to put in perspective. The cacophony of opinions he inspires can drown out your own thoughts. Just the release of the Moonrise Kingdom trailer set off impassioned reactions from both sides. In the context of such contentiousness, the movie itself almost feels like a rejoinder to criticsâ€”an artist doubling down on the very thing that drives the haters batty. But in the clear light of day, Moonrise Kingdom reveals something else: an artist who could care less about what we thinkâ€”and who couldnâ€™t do anything about it even if he did.
From its first frames, Moonrise Kingdom is unmistakably Andersonâ€™s. The dollhouse staging, cartoon costuming, frontal compositions, and quirky bric-a-brac are all here. No less Andersonian is the fantastical setting, the island of New Penzance, somewhere off the New England coast. A narrator (Bob Balaban) sets the scene: September 2, 1965, three days before a famous hurricane that wallops the island. Against this ominous backdrop, Anderson tells a classic lovers-on-the-run story, with a twistâ€”the lovers, in this case, are twelve-year-olds. The boy is Sam, an â€śemotionally disturbedâ€ť (so say his foster parents) misfit who runs away from his Khaki Scout outpost on the island. The girl is Suzy (Kara Hayward), his epistolary squeeze and fellow pariah, who yearns to escape her unhappy parents (Bill Murray and Frances McDormand). Sam has brought the maps and the camping gear; Suzy comes equipped with binoculars and a suitcase full of books. On the loversâ€™ trail are the scouts of Camp Ivanhoe, led by Scout Master Ward (Edward Norton) and Captain Sharp (Bruce Willis), the islandâ€™s only cop. The chase, as you may have predicted, climaxes during the storm, at a church no less, where the townsfolk have gathered for a production of Benjamin Brittenâ€™s childrenâ€™s choir favorite â€śNoyeâ€™s Fludde.â€ť
The collision between unruly nature and Andersonâ€™s hyper-controlâ€”not to mention the young-adult adventure-book vibeâ€”most readily recalls The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou. But if that movie saw Anderson stretch his sensibility to epic proportions (and to mixed results), Moonrise Kingdom brings a more intimate and handmade experience. Anderson here shows a greater degree of spontaneity, mirroring the resourcefulness of the couple on the run. Not that heâ€™s shaken off his famous fastidiousness. Moonrise Kingdom brims with the kind of detail that has become Andersonâ€™s calling card. Beyond the OCD art direction are behavioral flourishes that humanize his creations: the way Sam absent-mindedly presses on a water fountain button as he walks by it, or Suzyâ€™s delightful â€śOh, thank you!â€ť delivered mid-sentence when Sam hands her a bouquet of flowers.
In an interview with Dennis Lim, Anderson divulged that as a boy he once found a pamphlet on top of the family refrigerator: â€śCoping With the Very Troubled Child.â€ť No less a projection of its makerâ€™s boyhood than Hugo was for Scorsese, Moonrise Kingdom is a valentine to the child outcastâ€”and an undiluted expression of his singularity and innocence. In strange, geeky Sam, Anderson has found his ideal avatar (and in Suzy, his boyhood crush). One can easily see him as Max Fischer in a few years; his conversations with Capt. Sharp, who is touchingly free of condescension, anticipate Maxâ€™s friendship with Herman Blume. Life Aquatic featured one of the most revealing exchanges in all of Andersonâ€™s movies: â€śIn twelve years, heâ€™ll be eleven and a half,â€ť says one character of her unborn child. Steve Zissou responds, â€śThat was my favorite age.â€ť Moonrise Kingdom is the feature-length elaboration of that sentiment.
The movie is the directorâ€™s tightest. Cowriters Anderson and Roman Coppola eschew here the deus ex machina that marred Andersonâ€™s past movies, particularly Life Aquatic and Darjeeling Limited. In each of those films, a late-act tragedy, accompanied by a pop gem, felt roteâ€”Wes doing Wes. (Blessedly unadorned by a hipster mix tape, Moonrise Kingdom relies mainly on classical music cues, most prominently Benjamin Brittenâ€™s â€śThe Young Personâ€™s Guide to the Orchestraâ€ť and â€śNoyeâ€™s Fludde.â€ť) The epiphanies here never seem unearned. The Anderson formula of simple syrup spiked with acid finds breathtaking expression here. Out of the mouths of babes: when Suzy tells Sam that she always wished she was an orphan, the parentless Sam tells her bluntly, â€śI love you, but you donâ€™t know what youâ€™re talking about.â€ť Suzy responds, â€śI love you, too.â€ť And there is melancholy, too, not least in the heart-swelling final shot, at once a paean to and dirge for what we all must leave behind.
Set in the year Pierrot le fou, a seminal lovers-on-the-run movie, was released, Moonrise Kingdom is, as is typical of an Anderson film, a trove of movie references: the kidsâ€™ wilderness sojourn evokes Badlands (including a dance to a pop song in the middle of nowhere); the escape into a fairy tale wilderness recalls The Night of the Hunter (is it just me or is that right-to-left tracking shot late in the filmâ€”after an entire movie of left-to-right movesâ€”a nod to the same pivot in Charles Laughtonâ€™s masterpiece?). But the movies this reminds us most of are Andersonâ€™s. Writing for Mubi, Ignatiy Vishnevetsky perceptively noted that Moonrise Kingdom is â€śa miniature of the directorâ€™s whole body of work.â€ť Far from being unbearably hermetic, the movie finds Anderson disappearing deeper into his dollhouseâ€”and making his strongest picture in a decade.
Moonrise Kingdom is the work of an artist who either is oblivious or doesnâ€™t care about his polarizing status. The demand, from even some supporters, was to grow up. Instead, he followed up a stop-motion animation filmâ€”the terrific Fantastic Mr. Foxâ€”with a deeply felt tribute to adolescence. (Little did we know that the less successful Life Aquatic and Darjeeling were his stabs at growing up.) Moonrise Kingdom is familiar, there is no question, but Anderson comes by his repetitions honestlyâ€”he might not know any other way to make movies. But there is no calculation here; style has not calcified into shtick. This is who he is, and who heâ€™s always been.