Weight and Sea
By Jeff Reichert
The Man from London
Dir. BĂ©la Tarr, Hungary, IFC Films
Seven years ago BĂ©la Tarr graced movie screens with Werckmeister Harmonies, the last visionary masterpiece of a dying century, or, perhaps more accurately, the first of a new one. The former label has been applied to Tarrâ€™s 1994 epic SĂˇtĂˇntangĂł as well, but where that film is a more specific chronicle of mass uncertainty as experienced from just beyond the edge of Communismâ€™s collapse in Eastern Europe, the anxieties at the core of Werckmeister are less localized and thoroughly amorphous. Even though their roots sprout from the same milieu as Tarrâ€™s prior opus, in Werckmeister they assume a more millennial character. It was a few years into the 21st century before the film approached widespread availability here, but watching Werckmeister then was, and still is, an uneasy if exhilarating prospect, marked as it is by elusive traces of an earlier time. Contrasted against the chaos, madness, and destruction in its narrative, the elegant pairing of Tarrâ€™s phantasmagoric black-and-white imagery and composer MihĂˇly VĂgâ€™s plaintive circular odes consistently awes even as the emotions they evoke unsettle. The film reaches masterpiece status because its scenario perfectly balances timeliness with timelessness, resulting in a work that manages a statement about turn of the century angst. And the technical mastery of Werckmeister canâ€™t be overstatedâ€”if cinema has offered anything purer and more viscerally overwhelming, then Iâ€™m not aware of it.
Tarrâ€™s is a heavy, maximalist vision, as ambitiously difficult as it is endlessly generous to the spectator willing to fully enter its embrace. Grand effect is most often the product of grand effort, and The Man from London, Tarrâ€™s long-awaited follow-up to Werckmeister, arrives laden with a creation story marred by the suicide of a key producer, funding issues, massive investment in production infrastructure, and interminable delays. Almost as if to thumb his nose at the earthly concerns that bind the realization of his decidedly unearthly vision, Tarr launches his latest by transcending physicality altogether. It may not be an exaggeration to say that The Man from London opens with one of cinemaâ€™s great first shots, a nearly twelve-minute slow-burn that begins by recasting the prow of a large ship as a series of unimaginably beautiful and mysterious planar abstractions, then, in its continued movement upwards to the sky collapses and confuses our relationship to the objects and spaces around the ship, all to finally, abruptly shove us into the meat of Tarrâ€™s noir narrative via sudden alignment with the viewpoint of lonely dockworker Maloin (Miroslav Krobot), who witnesses a clandestine business transaction that leads to murder. Though it does contain story elements, the shot is more valuable (and commanding) for reminding us of the powers of the medium: in Tarrâ€™s complicated, inevitable cinematographic gymnastics we find potential actualized in the form of a brooding black-and-white meditation on cinema itself. As a filmmaker Tarr simply views the possibilities of space differently, and his magic as an artist lies in his success at forcing audiences to look like he does. If the rest of The Man from London isnâ€™t quite as stunning as its opening, itâ€™s almost no matterâ€”youâ€™ll have already sat through nearly ten percent of the filmâ€™s length by the time the shot ends.
Noting that this one part of The Man from London so fully overshadows the whole is in no way to suggest that thereâ€™s really much wrong here at all. But this is also not to suggest that it scales the giddy heights of Werckmeister Harmonies or SĂˇtĂˇntangĂł either. Most problematic is the thinness of the source novel by Georges Simenon (extraordinarily prolific, widely translated, and as such, an odd choice for such a director so accustomed to working hermetically with the same small team of collaborators) when paired with the lugubrious inexorability of Tarrâ€™s cinema. A very simple tale of a murder, a suitcase filled with currency, and various persons jockeying for control of the cash, The Man from London feels at times like a waste of a cinematic talent more famous for its detours into a highly unique brand of Eastern European (meta)physical squalor. Lacking the grandiose gestures and unique vision of longtime screenwriter LĂˇszlĂł Krasznahorkai (who did assist in the adaptation) that conjured a dead whale in a truck, or a young girl penitently euthanizing her cat and herself with arsenic, The Man from London feels somehow smaller than SĂˇtĂˇntangĂł or Werckmeister Harmonies, but the filmâ€™s more obvious negative attributes can be misleading. One shouldnâ€™t walk into a BĂ©la Tarr film expecting to leave and have a heated discussion about the dialogue or plot points. His choice of material may be disappointing, but Tarrâ€™s still brought the full force of his cinema to bear in translating it to the screen.
If the generally concrete tale of Maloin, head of a miserablist clan that includes his unnamed wife (Tilda Swinton, remarkably credible amongst Tarrâ€™s cast of now-familiar Eastern European malcontents) and teenaged daughter Hannah (Erika BĂłk) and the various powers searching for the case of money left adrift in the opening sequence, allows little room for the kinds of flights of imagination that mark his other great films as such, BĂ©la Tarr the filmmaker, meditative as he is, seems little interested in truly ratcheting the underlying tensions of a narrative that could easily have been replayed as the Hungarian cousin to Sam Raimiâ€™s A Simple Plan. This reluctance (or recalcitrance) results in a strange kind of elevationâ€”weâ€™re unused to seeing a thriller unfold at this pace; not unlike the manner in which the sexual power play in Damnation slowly grounds itself out over two hours, The Man from London certainly takes its time going through its motions. Some of the filmâ€™s detours recall his best moments: a pan from a tense interrogation about the missing case that reveals a pack of drunks balancing billiard balls on their heads references the opening celestial bodies sequence of Werckmeister; a side narrative in which Maloin sorts out his daughterâ€™s employment at a local grocer with its harridan of an owner helps ground the film in the universe for which Tarr is more well-known.
Technically perfect (minus MĂhaly VĂgâ€™s whirring and clicking score, which grates), The Man from London is so beautiful and carefully made a film it portends of those aesthetic losses weâ€™ll suffer as digital filmmaking continues its steady encroachment. Variety, host to an ever-reliable film reviewing department (tyro helmer should score boffo b.o.!), describes The Man from London as â€śgood but not great Tarr.â€ť Apt, but this omits the fact that great Tarr is truly the best of cinema. If we are to deal with Tarr thatâ€™s merely â€śgood,â€ť it should be acknowledged that even on this level he remains better than almost anyone else. There are only a handful of filmmakers working today who make each camera movement resonate with the force of true meaning (Olivier Assayas and Hou Hsiao-hsien come immediately to mind), and Tarr is most certainly one of them, if not the best of the bunch. Each of his stark black-and-white images reeks of the true consideration we ask of any visual artist, and that Tarr has chosen to apply his formidable talents to questionable material is almost beside the point. If Simenonâ€™s novel may seem unworthy of further attention after watching The Man from London, we cinephiles should be grateful that it inspired such a formidable filmmaker to go back to work. As much a Tarr fan as I am, if I do have reservations about The Man from London in relation to his other films, theyâ€™re generally small. No, The Man from London isnâ€™t Werckmeister Harmonies or SĂˇtĂˇntangĂł, but it doesnâ€™t need, nor want to be. Itâ€™s a BĂ©la Tarr film, and thatâ€™s more than enough.