Computers and Blues
By Adam Nayman
Men, Women and Children
Dir. Jason Reitman, U.S., Paramount
David Fincher, Christopher Nolan, and now Jason Reitmanâ€”it seems like everybody wants to be Stanley Kubrick these days. Men, Women & Children begins in deep space, with images of the Voyager space probe twirling serenely underneath a crisp, omniscient, scene-setting voiceover by Emma Thompson. Itâ€™s 2001: A Space Odyssey mashed up with Barry Lyndon. But when the camera eventually descends from way, way up in the air and heads down to Earthâ€”more specifically a Texan football town Ă la Friday Night Lightsâ€”it lands squarely in Reitmanland, that blasted outpost of mainstream moviemaking situated on a uniquely uncanny valley. In a time when other filmmakers struggle to integrate CGI characters into live-action worlds, this two-time Academy Award nominee has consistently succeeded in fashioning his flesh-and-blood ensembles into cartoon communities.
There are a lot of decent actors in Men, Women & Children, and itâ€™s only fair to point out that a few of them do good work, namely Judy Greer (an ace with cartoon characters, by the way) and Dean Norris, who manage something like a decent scene together around the movieâ€™s midpoint. Both of them are playing single parents whose pubescent progeny are having personal struggles; sheâ€™s got a daughter who harbors unreasonable dreams of reality TV stardom (albeit egged on by her failed-actress mom), while heâ€™s sweating the fact that his star-quarterback son would rather play World of Warcraft alone in his room than suit up for the school team. Misery loves company, and as they bounce their grievances and fears off one another, thereâ€™s a palpable sense of how mutual confusion begets shared attractionâ€”an electric charge that briefly transforms grown-ups into teenagers.
And thatâ€™s it: thereâ€™s nothing else good to say about Men, Women & Children, while the bad things one might say about it are manifoldâ€”as evidenced by its rather brutal reception thus far. The filmâ€™s first press screening at the Toronto International Film Festival was a morbidly giddy event, like a boozy wake for a clown. What a difference a decade makes. Beginning with his smug 2005 debut Thank You for Smoking (a gleeful rejoinder to anti-Big Tobacco thrust of The Insider), the director had enfolded an evidently neoconservative worldview in surface signifiers of hip contemporaneityâ€”indie-rock eccentricity in Juno (2007); quasi anti-corporate satire in Up in the Air (2009); postâ€“Mean Girls/Gone Girl anti-PC posturing in Young Adult (2011)â€”and been either lavishly praised or else given a pass by liberal reviewers who couldnâ€™t (or didnâ€™t want to) look through the movies to their cores.
But Labor Day, about a jittery single mother who literally has to be held hostage in her own home by a hot outlaw to realize her station in life, was so obviously the (peach) pits that nobody went to bat for it. Reitman didnâ€™t actually do anything wrong(er) on that film; he made the same sort of burnished, fundamentally bogus comedy-drama as usual, except that for whatever reason, the rose colored glasses worn by certain writers when looking at his work came offâ€”and with them came the gloves. To my eyes, nothing in Labor Day was as offensive as the late development in Up in the Air where the suicide of (pace Alessandra Stanley) an Angry Black Woman is 1) used to catalyze the self-actualization of a white-collar henchman played by George Clooney and 2) swept under the rug by Clooneyâ€™s character so as not to jeopardize the career prospects of Anna Kendrickâ€™s ethical-idiot corporate striver. (And donâ€™t get me started on the filmâ€™s usage of documentary footage of shit-canned American workers to lubricate its tale of executive-class woe.)
Still, late-breaking comeuppance is better than none at all. As to the question of where Men, Women & Children ranks in its creatorâ€™s oeuvre, the answer is probably somewhere toward the bottom, although this is more a matter of weak dramaturgy than any truly damning stupidity. Basically, in trying to make a movie about how social media inflects and infects every aspect of daily life, Reitman and his co-screenwriter Erica Cressida Wilson (working from a novel by Chad Kultgen) stretch themselves Android-phone skinny: their characters are all refugees from other movies, from the prosperous but loveless middle-aged couple (Adam Sandler and Rosemarie DeWitt) to the wise-beyond-her-years class outcast (Kaitlyn Dever doing a bone-chillingly accurate Ellen Page impression) to the sexless, nattering neighborhood harridan (Jennifer Garner, giving a brilliant performance as The Simpsonsâ€™ Helen Lovejoy). Issues addressed include bullying, peer pressure, eating disorders, and helicopter parenting (Garnerâ€™s character is a technophobe who takes her fear of the Internet to extremes; sheâ€™s emblematic of the scriptâ€™s hysterical pitch).
The sole storytelling innovation is to pile these individual narratives and hot button topics on top of one another to create a sense of complexity, to which we can say that Paul Haggis got there first. The sole artistic inspiration is to annotate the action with graphical overlays of the charactersâ€™ IM and text-message bubbles to which we can say Neveldine/Taylor got there firstâ€”in Gamer, to far greater satirical (and much more horrifying) effect. So, even though Men, Women & Children has no shortage of eye-rolling scenesâ€”like when DeWittâ€™s stifled hausfrau uses Ashleymadison.com to score a date and ends up melting like butter in the giant paws of a purring Dennis Haysbert to the velvety strains of vintage soul music (and, fine, one more: Sandler getting all puppy-dog pathetic and paternal in the presence of an $800-per-hour hooker during his own personal journey of secret infidelity)â€” itâ€™s not a particularly remarkable failure. As with Junoâ€™s cluttered bedrooms and Up in the Airâ€™s sleek airport lounges, Reitman is able to evoke a sense of crippling insularity (this may or may not be a compliment).
Of course, a truly intimate or small-scale movie is out of the question. Those invocations of Voyager and Carl Saganâ€”and Thompsonâ€™s narration, which substitutes haughty condescension about the characters and their motivations for Kubrickâ€™s studied, tragic distanceâ€”are hail-mary attempts to get across the theme of â€śuniversality,â€ť the convenient discovery of which within the narrow confines of American suburbia is a fallacy dating back to American Beauty, this movieâ€™s true spiritual progenitor even if it pivoted on the possession of consumer-grade video cameras rather than iPhones (it also totally filches the conceit of the teenaged temptress whoâ€™s actually a clueless virgin, except that it holds back on drenching her in rose petals).
Fifteen years on, American Beautyâ€™s basic formulaâ€”painstakingly â€śrelatableâ€ť upper-middle-class characters concealing anguish from the camera and each other and eventually busted wide open for our pity and delectationâ€”has endured (and spread to premium-cable television) without getting any more persuasive. It has gotten more familiar, however, and while there could be some dynamic tension between a retrograde dramatic framework and cutting-edge technology, we just get a superficially newfangled variation on the old model. One wonders how many of the writers currently flogging Men, Women & Children for being reactionaryâ€”which it is, especially at the end, when Sandler smirkingly insinuates that the only way to carry on in this modern world is to pretend nothingâ€™s wrong and focus on breakfastâ€”fell for American Beautyâ€™s falsely anti-establishment rhetoric or Up in the Airâ€™s repugnantly airbrushed elitism. Chances are that the evidence is out there somewhere on the Internet, for all to see. Score one for Jason Reitman.