A Bitter Tomorrow
By Danny King
Listen Up Philip
Dir. Alex Ross Perry, U.S., Tribeca Film
Writer-director Alex Ross Perry (Impolex, The Color Wheel) spends the opening, pre-title-card minutes of Listen Up Philip sketching the repugnant behavior that his protagonist, Brooklyn-based author Philip Lewis Friedman (Jason Schwartzman), has made his stock-in-trade. In the first dialogue scene, Philipâ€”whose second novel, Obidant, is on the verge of publicationâ€” meets an ex-girlfriend, Mona (Samantha Jacober), for lunch, but the get-together quickly turns into an opportunity for him to scold her. He launches into a tirade about their botched relationship, and how Monaâ€™s presence held him back; were they still together, thereâ€™s no way heâ€™d be where he is today, he claims. In the second dialogue scene, Philip meets his former college roommate, Parker (Steven Boyer), for a beer, and criticizes him (as he did Mona) for what he sees as Parkerâ€™s personal failings. Following these beat-downs, Philip returns home to his photographer girlfriend, Ashley (Elisabeth Moss), and tells her about them. In a wonderful throwaway line, Ashley teasingly deems Philipâ€™s aggression â€śpretty hotâ€ťâ€”a clear indication that, at this juncture, she is completely unaware of her boyfriendâ€™s true capacity for cruelty.
What Philip doesnâ€™t understandâ€”and what he probably still doesnâ€™t understand 108 minutes later, when Listen Up Philip endsâ€”is that, after he triumphantly storms out of situations like these, the objects of his derision (whether it be Mona, Parker, or anyone else) will lick their wounds and go on with their lives. This leaves Philip on the outside, thinking heâ€™s above it all, when heâ€™s really the most pathetic character in his own life story. But this realization only slowly dawns on the viewer; for a while, Perry and Schwartzman do a convincing job of dramatizing the nasty appeal of this kind of take-no-prisoners lifestyle. After posing for photographs for the new book, Philip is approached by a worker at the shoot, Emily (Starletâ€™s Dree Hemingway), and ends up asking her out. Over drinks, Philip unearths his secret agenda: Emily had rebuffed Philipâ€™s advances back when he was in the midst of publishing his first novel, and Philip has only met with her to return the favor. â€śIâ€™ll call you,â€ť he lies, undoing his tie, as he leaves Emily on the sidewalk. Itâ€™s clear that he gets a high from such taunts.
Even better than such petty victories is the fact that Philipâ€™s brutal narcissism makes him an ideal protĂ©gĂ© for a hero of his: the towering, reclusive author Ike Zimmerman (a tremendous Jonathan Pryce). Impressed by Obidant, Zimmerman suggests a meeting with Philip purely on mentor-subject terms, but the two are such mirror images of each other that they fast become friends. Zimmerman invites Philip to his country house, where the lack of city noise and combustion makes for a more productive creative environment. Much to Ashleyâ€™s chagrin, Philip acceptsâ€”and, to make matters even worse for his relationship, his stay in the country is vastly extended after he accepts an adjunct creative-writing position at Lambert College. Philip has it allâ€”a steady income, a quiet place to write, the constant company of a mammoth literary figureâ€”while Ashley is left wondering how Philip could walk away from a nearly three-year relationship in the blink of an eye.
The obvious risk of a whip-smart acidic comedy like Listen Up Philip is its potential for glorifying the narcissism of its male creative characters. The breakneck speed of the movieâ€”fast, conversation-focused editing by Robert Greene; huge, brisk chunks of third-person narration spoken by Eric Bogosianâ€”forces us to keep up with Philipâ€™s darting consciousness, and initially we respect him for the tempo at which his mind moves and even for the rude, cutting remarks that fly out of his mouth. This is well exemplified when Philip first visits Lambert, voicing to Zimmerman his contempt for the polite social decorum of the academic personalities in the room. â€śThey just want to be your friend,â€ť Zimmerman mockingly replies. A woman then approaches them and asks, â€śIs there a trash in here?â€ť â€śYes, Iâ€™m right here,â€ť Philip responds, much to Zimmermanâ€™s delight. For Zimmerman and Philip, this room and the people in it are beneath them. For the viewer, itâ€™s simply a riot to see Pryceâ€”who appears so invigorated here to be playing a role of significant stature after what seems like years of dismissible projectsâ€”spitting up his red wine like a stupid, drunk teenager.
About thirty or forty minutes in, though, the gloves come off and Perry gets to work cutting these men down to size. Leaving Philip off-screen for a notable amount of time (a gambit Perry has claimed was inspired by William Gaddisâ€™s decision to make his protagonist disappear for long passages in The Recognitions), Perry devotes an entire sequence and a bulk of narration to Ashley. Still reeling from her separation with Philip, Ashley finds herself in a lonely rut, unable to move forward. At one point, she remembers sitting with Philip in a bar, where their charming conversation is interrupted by his random, unnecessarily harsh confrontation (â€śGo fuck yourselfâ€¦Get the fuck out of here right nowâ€ť) with another patron. Philip is kept off-screen as he rants, with the head-on camera focusing on Ashley, aligning us with her point of view; when the memory ends, the movie cuts back to Ashleyâ€™s face in present-day reality. Here, as in the rest of the Ashley-centered sequence, Perry and DP Sean Price Williamsâ€”shooting handheld on cozy, warmly lit, nostalgically grainy 16mmâ€”read Ashleyâ€™s face as a shaken postwar zone, reflecting the destruction Philip has left in his wake. The movieâ€™s most astonishing image might be the forty-second close-up on Ashley that occurs after she refuses Philipâ€™s first request to move back into their apartment. Mossâ€™s face projects a remarkable range of emotions here: sorrow, loneliness, giddiness, anger, fear.
Perry then fleshes out Zimmerman in a comparably substantial manner, putting his long-running track record of isolation and hostility under the microscope. Instead of merely continuing to ignore the daughter (Krysten Ritter) who lives with him at the retreat, he takes to actively berating her, casually dropping words and phrases like â€śbitchâ€ť and â€śpain in the assâ€ť in her direction. He starts sucking down 25-year-old Laphroaig like a fish, and, in one disastrously uncomfortable sceneâ€”which critic Ignatiy Vishnevetsky has rightly compared to John Cassavetesâ€™s Husbandsâ€”he tries to score a couple of younger women for himself and his aging writer pal. When one of the ladies asks if anybody else will be showing up to the party, Zimmerman calls Philip to demand his company, and the desperation in his voiceâ€”his crippling fear that Philip might be busy or unable to show upâ€”further reveals his emotional immaturity. (Let it not go unnoticed that the title of Zimmermanâ€™s breakthrough novel is nothing less than Madness & Women.) If Zimmermanâ€™s weakness here is so naked that it encourages a whisper of empathy, his behavior elsewhere (cursing at his daughter, speaking proudly of a record of burning bridges) justly cements him as a poisonous person.
Considering that Perry identifies as a hardcore cinephile, his style is surprisingly performance-driven: his work prioritizes dialogue and the close-up. This isnâ€™t to say his movies, with their staunch commitment to celluloid, arenâ€™t beautiful to look at, but that his voice comes through via the accumulation of emotion rather than visual flourish. In the case of Listen Up Philip, he also shows his absolutely dead-on instinct about what to leave off-screen. Philip, for instance, like Maurice Pialatâ€™s We Wonâ€™t Grow Old Together (1972)â€”another film about an artist (a film director, in this case) and his destructive relationshipsâ€”conveys no actual interest in its protagonistâ€™s artistic process. Unlike Zimmerman, who through his old age and his list of notable achievements still manages to emit a writerly aura, there is no mystique or romance to Philip and his writing process.
Listen Up Philip can at least partly be looked at as autobiography: the bearded, fast-talking, thirty-year-old Perry certainly resembles the bearded, fast-talking, thirty-something Philip. Additionally, Perry has singled out a subplot involving a rival writer of Philipâ€™s (played by Keith Poulson) as based on personal experience. But the problems the film is working through are more expansive than this would suggest, a fact that is aided by Perryâ€™s purposeful use of narration. Kane, the last name of the Ashley character, seems notable hereâ€”in another life, Orson Welles would have made a killer Ike Zimmerman, and he might have even narrated the thing himself. But unlike the rich timbres of Wellesâ€™s narration in The Magnificent Ambersons, Bogosianâ€™s voice is objective and removedâ€”he doesnâ€™t judge or accentuate, but states things flatly and factually. Nevertheless, his lack of emoting does little to keep Listen Up Philipâ€™s narration-heavy closing passages from registering as tragic. In Mossâ€™s final scene, Ashley is seen content and poised, and she refuses to let Philip into her house, leaving him on the streets of New York with a box and nowhere to stay. In this moment, Philip has finally gotten his â€ścomeuppance,â€ť to borrow a word from Wellesâ€™s Ambersons narration. Perryâ€™s camera then fixes on Schwartzman as Bogosian flashes through years and decades, distilling Philipâ€™s futureâ€”which sounds a lot like Zimmermanâ€™s (a mix of wealth, acclaim, and loneliness)â€”into a couple of terse sentences. We might as well be watching the characterâ€™s death.